
While many groups are concerned selectively with the conservation of whales from an animal rights standpoint, there is also a health incentive for not supporting the whaling industry. Even if one cannot distinguish between slaughtering a whale for food and slaughtering a cow, the nutritional benefits of whale meat come at a heavy price. Most whale fat and protein contains toxins which have accumulated from eating krill and fish that are exposed to chemicals.
According to Greenpeace the market for whale meat in Japan is only about 4,000 tons annually despite it being one of the largest consumers of whale meat in the world. Most of this is bought through the national scientific whaling program and consumed as sashimi (raw sushi). While this is only a small portion of the nation’s seafood consumption per capita (about .05 percent) in other regions where aboriginal whaling takes place in Russia, Canada, the Caribbean and Australia it can be a source of essential protein. Unfortunately, human dumping of chemicals, run off from fertilizers in crops, and other sources of ocean contamination are absorbed by creatures on the bottom of the food chain. Over time, through the process of bio-magnification, the toxins that might only exist at small levels in fish and krill, accumulate until the reach toxic levels as whales consume large quantities of those animals. When this occurs, whenever a person eats whale meat or blubber, they are taking the risk of consuming a very toxic amount of dioxins, polyflourinated biphenyl (PCB, which is a component of many modern chemicals and materials) and methyl mercury. For more explicit information on this visit the link to the health and human services page about whale meat consumption and toxins.
In large quantities this whale meat and blubber has been known to cause congenital defects in children and could possibly lead to mercury poisoning and kidney disease. In a report covering a study of whale meat collected throughout Japan in 2003, the amount of mercury exceeded the national health limit in every case of collection.
Bio magnification does not just occur in ocean populations, it takes place in many different animal populations and is a testament to the impact humans have made on their environment. Currently Iceland is looking to expand into the Japanese whale meat market by killing an additional 150 whales a year. This is being done out of economic desperation, as Iceland went bankrupt in 2007 during the onset of the financial crisis. In reality the Japanese whaling market is shrinking, and there will be no capacity for additional imports of whale meat. Younger generations of Japanese do not eat whale meat, whale meat is not distributed widely by the largest supermarkets in Japan and it is not safe for human consumption. Yet because people can sell whale meat at a high price, there is always a lure to enter the whaling market.
By participating in anti-whaling campaigns, encouraging whale watching, and making the health hazards of whale meat publicly available it discourages the entrance of new whalers into the whaling market. If the number of whales imported into Japan goes up, and the cost of whale meat goes down, it may encourage more people to consume it because there is a myth that whale meat is healthy for you. The truth is that whale meat is simply not safe to eat anymore, and the killing of whales for food should not be accepted unless a person has no other dietary alternative. Even in those cases of aboriginal whaling, the native whalers are feeling the effects of the toxins that have begun to encroach on the source of their diet. It may be that even in preventing whaling for the benefit of the whales, we may be benefiting ourselves by an even greater degree.



